The Supreme Court's decision, which landed amid a backlash to diversity programs, could increase "reverse discrimination" ...

Marlean Ames filed a reverse discrimination lawsuit in 2020 after she lost out on two jobs to colleagues who were gay at the ...

The US Supreme Court has unanimously sided with Marlean Ames, an Ohio woman who claimed she was discriminated against at work ...

The Supreme Court unanimously determined that an Ohio woman can move forward with her complaint that a state agency passed ...

The justices stated that under federal law, there is no distinction between “discrimination” and “reverse discrimination.” It’s all illegal and subject to the same standards.

The Supreme Court rightly held that straight white people do not need to meet a higher burden in court when suing for discrimination.

As widely expected, the Supreme Court’s June 5, 2025 decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services confirmed that a plaintiff ...

In a move set to make legal history, the US Supreme Court ruled in favour of a straight woman who took her employers to court ...

The court’s ruling in favor of a woman who says she was passed over for jobs because she is straight is correct in theory—but ...

The United States Supreme Court has held that the evidentiary standards for “reverse discrimination” claims under federal employment law must be ...

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, the only Black woman on the high court, wrote the opinion that sided with Marlean Ames, an Ohio state government employee who argued it was unconstitutional to have ...

In a 9-0 decision authored by liberal Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, the high court ruled that plaintiff Marlean Ames did not have to meet a higher burden of proof to prove that she was ...