The Supreme Court unanimously rejected the "background circumstances" rule, which held major-group employees to a higher ...

White individuals and straight people do not need to meet a higher burden of proof than members of minority groups to prevail in employment discrimination suits, the Supreme Court held June 5. The ...

On June 5, 2025, a unanimous U.S. Supreme Court invalidated how some courts evaluated so-called “reverse discrimination” ...

The discrimination case of an Ohio woman suing her gay supervisor for promoting a lesbian woman instead of her is set to make ...

The United States Supreme Court has held that the evidentiary standards for “reverse discrimination” claims under federal employment law must be ...

Attorney Marc Brown said, "the floodgates have been let open" after the Supreme Court's ruling on reverse discrimination.

The justices stated that under federal law, there is no distinction between “discrimination” and “reverse discrimination.” It’s all illegal and subject to the same standards.

In Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services, No. 23-1039 (S. Ct. June 5, 2025), the US Supreme Court unanimously dispelled ...

On June 5, 2025, the Supreme Court unanimously held that a Plaintiff alleging reverse discrimination under Title VII be held to the same standard as if they belonged to another suspect class. Ames v.

The pipeline for women of color into positions of power collapses without the protections and advocacy DEI provides. This war on "woke" is costly for America.

THE Department of Health (DOH) has called for the declaration of a national public health emergency for human immunodeficiency virus infections.