In her lawsuit, Marlean Ames, from Ohio, alleged she'd been snubbed and demoted in favour of queer candidates. Her victory ...

The United States Supreme Court has held that the evidentiary standards for “reverse discrimination” claims under federal employment law must be ...

The justices stated that under federal law, there is no distinction between “discrimination” and “reverse discrimination.” It’s all illegal and subject to the same standards.

As widely expected, the Supreme Court’s June 5, 2025 decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services confirmed that a plaintiff ...

The Supreme Court rightly held that straight white people do not need to meet a higher burden in court when suing for discrimination.

A unanimous Supreme Court made it easier Thursday to bring lawsuits over so-called reverse discrimination, sidin ...

Ordinarily, Title VII discrimination suits are resolved through what’s called a burden-shifting framework. Initially, the ...

In a significant moment for legal equality, the U.S. Supreme Court delivered a unanimous verdict that challenges the narrative of a one-sided discrimination landscape, ruling against a subtle but ...

The plaintiff in a case on which the U.S. Supreme Court handed down a decision on Thursday is named Marlean Ames. She filed a reverse discrimination ...

Attorney Marc Brown said, "the floodgates have been let open" after the Supreme Court's ruling on reverse discrimination.