News
The U.S. Supreme Court sided with an Ohio woman who claimed to be the victim of reverse discrimination because she is ...
The lawyer who successfully argued Ames v. Ohio says the real win is for even-handed law, not for dismantling DEI.
Interviewing for a job or competing for a promotion just got fairer. In a unanimous ruling on Thursday, the U.S. Supreme Court leveled the legal playing ...
I am not suggesting that discrimination cannot go the other way. It is conceivable that a minority group can discriminate ...
On Thursday, December 5, the Supreme Court revived the claim of Marlean Ames, who sued the Ohio Department of Youth Services, under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, which ...
The Supreme Court’s recent ruling eliminates the concept of reverse discrimination and changes how majority-group status is ...
In a unanimous (9-0) ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court has held that Title VII specifically (and the Equal Protection Clause, ...
The justices stated that under federal law, there is no distinction between “discrimination” and “reverse discrimination.” It’s all illegal and subject to the same standards.
Attorney Marc Brown said, "the floodgates have been let open" after the Supreme Court's ruling on reverse discrimination.
The Supreme Court unanimously rejected the "background circumstances" rule, which held major-group employees to a higher ...
A unanimous Supreme Court made it easier Thursday to bring lawsuits over so-called reverse discrimination, sidin ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results