The justices stated that under federal law, there is no distinction between “discrimination” and “reverse discrimination.” It’s all illegal and subject to the same standards.

A unanimous Supreme Court made it easier Thursday to bring lawsuits over so-called reverse discrimination, sidin ...

In a significant moment for legal equality, the U.S. Supreme Court delivered a unanimous verdict that challenges the narrative of a one-sided discrimination landscape, ruling against a subtle but ...

The plaintiff in a case on which the U.S. Supreme Court handed down a decision on Thursday is named Marlean Ames. She filed a reverse discrimination ...

Attorney Marc Brown said, "the floodgates have been let open" after the Supreme Court's ruling on reverse discrimination.

The Supreme Court ruled requirements for discrimination lawsuits do not vary based on if the plaintiff is a member of the ...

On June 5, 2025, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services in which the Plaintiff ...

T he Supreme Court Thursday made it easier to bring "reverse discrimination" workplace lawsuits, ruling unanimously in favor ...

With DEI already under threat, employers are bracing for a wave of reverse discrimination claims from "majority" groups such ...

Plus: The Department of Homeland Security is ending its Quiet Skies surveillance program. | SCOTUS sides with woman in ...

A Supreme Court decision yesterday on a case of workplace discrimination could have major impacts on the employment landscape ...