On June 5, 2025, the Supreme Court unanimously held that a Plaintiff alleging reverse discrimination under Title VII be held to the same standard as if they belonged to another suspect class. Ames v.

On June 5, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously agreed that reverse discrimination plaintiffs are not required to produce additional evidence ...

On June 5, 2025, a unanimous U.S. Supreme Court invalidated how some courts evaluated so-called “reverse discrimination” ...

Attorney Marc Brown said, "the floodgates have been let open" after the Supreme Court's ruling on reverse discrimination.

The justices stated that under federal law, there is no distinction between “discrimination” and “reverse discrimination.” It’s all illegal and subject to the same standards.

In Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services, No. 23-1039 (S. Ct. June 5, 2025), the US Supreme Court unanimously dispelled ...

The Supreme Court unanimously rejected the "background circumstances" rule, which held major-group employees to a higher ...

The pipeline for women of color into positions of power collapses without the protections and advocacy DEI provides. This war on "woke" is costly for America.

A unanimous Supreme Court made it easier Thursday to bring lawsuits over so-called reverse discrimination, sidin ...

The US Supreme Court unanimously ruled Thursday against imposing a higher burden of proof for reverse discrimination lawsuits under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The Court reversed on a ...

Ames will now get a second chance to prove her discrimination claims in federal court. The broader effect of Thursday's ...